Documentation with Sphinx: Classroom Bootcamp
An eight-hour classroom bootcamp on writing high quality technical documentation with Sphinx and reStructuredText, taught on Smarter’s own documentation. Smarter’s documentation, published at docs.smarter.sh from docs/source/, has more than nine hundred pages: user guides that follow one pattern, thirty-one Architecture Decision Records, and more than five hundred pages of API reference generated by autodoc from reStructuredText docstrings, including Django and Pydantic models. Its conf.py, Read the Docs configuration and fast checks are all in the repository, and it is written for coding agents as much as for people. Students improve a real page, write docstrings, and write an ADR. See Course Formats and Grading for the standard bootcamp day, the grading scale and the course policies, and Creating High Quality Documentation with Sphinx for an overview of the subject.
At a Glance
Students |
Developers, technical writers, and students in technical communication. |
Deployment |
Each student has a fork and clone of the repository, with the Python virtual environment
set up ( |
Cost |
Free. |
Learning Objectives
By the end of the bootcamp, students can:
Write reStructuredText: headings, lists, links, code blocks, tables, admonitions and cross-references.
Explain how a Sphinx project is organized:
conf.py, extensions, toctrees and the build.Classify documentation by purpose (tutorial, how-to, reference, explanation) and write for one purpose at a time.
Write reStructuredText docstrings that autodoc renders as API reference.
Write an Architecture Decision Record.
Technical Prerequisites
Required: the command line, and a text editor (Visual Studio Code with the reStructuredText extension is recommended).
Required: Git: fork, clone, branch, commit, push and pull requests, and a GitHub account.
Required: Python 3 installed, and creating a virtual environment.
Helpful: reading Python (for the docstrings lab), Markdown, and experience writing for an audience.
Schedule
The files that the lectures refer to are listed in full under Smarter in the Source Code.
Block |
Min |
Content |
|---|---|---|
1 |
45 |
Lecture 1: Documentation as a product. Who reads documentation, and why they give up.
Docs as code: plain text, version control, review and CI. Diátaxis: tutorials, how-to
guides, reference and explanation. A tour of |
2 |
45 |
Lab 1: Your first Sphinx project. Run |
3 |
45 |
Lecture 2: reStructuredText in depth. Heading levels, inline markup, |
4 |
45 |
Lab 2: Improve a page. Find a page in Smarter’s docs that is unclear, out of date or missing an example, and improve it. Produces Assignment 2. |
5 |
45 |
Lecture 3: Writing clearly. Audience and purpose, plain language, active voice, one idea per paragraph, examples that work, and evergreen prose that does not go stale with each release. Documentation Style Guide & Technical Reference. |
6 |
45 |
Lecture 4: Docstrings and autodoc. Sphinx autodoc, reStructuredText field lists
( |
7 |
45 |
Lab 3: Document a module. Write or improve the docstrings of a small Smarter module, and render them with autodoc in the Lab 1 project. Produces Assignment 3. |
8 |
45 |
Lecture 5: Architecture Decision Records. Why record decisions, Michael Nygard’s format, and a reading of two of Smarter’s ADRs. |
9 |
45 |
Lab 4: Draft an ADR. Draft an ADR for a decision in a project of your own, and swap it with a neighbor for comments. Ungraded. |
10 |
45 |
Lecture 6: Publishing and maintaining. Read the Docs, building on every release, link checking with a script that takes seconds instead of a twenty-minute build, docs in code review, and keeping docs consistent with the code. |
11 |
30 |
Capstone kickoff. Students choose a capstone and outline it. |
Smarter in the Source Code
Every lecture, lab and assignment in this course rests on the files below. Every reference is to
the main branch of github.com/smarter-sh/smarter,
so that students can open each one during class, beside the published pages at
docs.smarter.sh.
The Project
Topic |
What Smarter does |
Where to look |
|---|---|---|
The source |
More than nine hundred reStructuredText pages: user guides for each resource, the platform and the framework, thirty-one decision records, and more than five hundred pages of generated API reference. |
|
The configuration |
Sphinx with autodoc, napoleon, |
|
Publishing |
Read the Docs builds and publishes the site, with its dependencies pinned in their own requirements file. |
|
Building locally |
|
Makefile ( |
Pages to Study
Kind of page |
Example |
Where to look |
|---|---|---|
A resource guide |
The Guardrail page: overview, how it works, a complete manifest, topic sections and a technical reference toctree, the pattern that every resource page follows. |
|
An autodoc page |
A few lines that publish a module’s docstrings. |
|
Examples that are files |
Manifests kept as files and included with |
|
Decision records |
Thirty-one ADRs and an introduction, each with status, context, decision, alternatives and consequences. |
|
A course plan |
These instructor pages use list-tables, includes and cross-references heavily, and the
|
Docstrings and Checks
Topic |
What Smarter does |
Where to look |
|---|---|---|
Docstrings worth copying |
Module docstrings that explain why, not only what, such as the protections and their known limits in the hardened HTTP client, and the usage examples in the infrastructure facade. ADR 029. |
plugin/plugin/safe_http.py, infrastructure/services/__init__.py |
The docstring style |
reStructuredText field lists ( |
|
Fast checks |
A script that checks every |
|
Spelling |
codespell on every commit, with the project’s own list of accepted words. |
|
Writing rules |
Evergreen prose with no “what’s new” sections, terms defined on first use, valid manifests in every example, and docs updated in the same change as the code. |
|
Writing for agents |
|
Graded Assignments
Assignment 1: A Small Sphinx Project
Students build a three-page Sphinx project about a topic they know well, with a toctree, cross-references, a code block, a table and an admonition.
Turn in: a Git repository with the source, and the built HTML (or a screenshot of each page).
Criterion |
Pts |
Exemplary |
Developing |
|---|---|---|---|
Builds cleanly |
5 |
No warnings. |
Warnings or errors. |
Markup |
6 |
Every required element used correctly. |
Elements missing or broken. |
Structure |
5 |
Toctree and cross-references make it navigable. |
Pages not linked. |
Writing |
4 |
Clear and purposeful. |
Unfocused. |
Assignment 2: An Improved Page
Students improve one page of Smarter’s documentation, and explain what was wrong and why the change helps.
Turn in: a pull request against their fork.
Criterion |
Pts |
Exemplary |
Developing |
|---|---|---|---|
Real improvement |
7 |
Fixes an error, adds a missing example, or clarifies a confusing passage. |
Cosmetic changes only. |
Accuracy |
5 |
Checked against the code; examples work. |
Untested examples. |
Markup |
4 |
Valid; |
Broken links or markup. |
Pull request |
4 |
Explains the problem and the fix. |
No description. |
Assignment 3: Docstrings for a Module
Students write the docstrings for a small module in Smarter’s style, and show how autodoc renders them.
Turn in: a pull request against their fork, and a screenshot of the rendered page.
Criterion |
Pts |
Exemplary |
Developing |
|---|---|---|---|
Completeness |
6 |
Every public function and class, with parameters, returns and raises. |
Some objects undocumented. |
Usefulness |
6 |
Explains why and when, not only what. |
Restates the function name. |
Style |
4 |
Field lists and cross-references as in ADR 029; hooks pass. |
Inconsistent. |
Rendering |
4 |
Renders without warnings. |
Broken rendering. |
Capstone Projects
Students choose one. Capstones are due one week after the bootcamp.
Capstone A: A Tutorial for Smarter
Learning objective. Write a tutorial that takes a newcomer from nothing to a working result, and test it on a real reader.
Students write a new tutorial for Smarter’s documentation, for example “Your first LLMClient with a plugin and a guardrail”, following the Diátaxis definition of a tutorial, with manifests that they have verified, and test it on someone who has never used Smarter.
What students turn in:
A pull request against their fork with the page, linked into a toctree.
Notes from the user test: where the reader got stuck, and what was changed.
A half-page note on the tutorial’s audience and scope.
How it is graded (100 points):
Criterion |
Pts |
Exemplary |
Developing |
|---|---|---|---|
Tutorial form |
20 |
Learning by doing, one path, a visible result at each step. |
A reference page with steps. |
Accuracy |
25 |
Every command and manifest works as written. |
Steps fail. |
User test |
20 |
Real reader; problems found and fixed. |
No test. |
Writing |
20 |
Clear, friendly and concise. |
Wordy or confusing. |
Markup and integration |
15 |
Valid, linked, consistent with neighbors. |
Orphaned or broken. |
Capstone B: Documentation for Your Own Project
Learning objective. Build and publish a complete documentation site for a project, covering all four kinds of documentation.
Students set up Sphinx for a project of their own (or an open source project that lacks docs), with a tutorial, a how-to guide, an explanation page, an API reference from docstrings, and an ADR, and publish it on Read the Docs.
What students turn in:
A repository with the docs source, configuration and docstrings.
A link to the published site.
A half-page note mapping each page to its Diátaxis category.
How it is graded (100 points):
Criterion |
Pts |
Exemplary |
Developing |
|---|---|---|---|
Four kinds of docs |
25 |
Each page serves one purpose well. |
Pages mix purposes. |
API reference |
20 |
Generated from complete docstrings. |
Sparse docstrings. |
ADR |
15 |
A real decision, with alternatives and consequences. |
A description, not a decision. |
Published |
20 |
Builds on Read the Docs without warnings. |
Not published. |
Writing |
20 |
Clear and consistent. |
Inconsistent. |
Recommended Texts
Pre-reading: Diátaxis, the four short pages on tutorials, how-to guides, reference and explanation.
Reference: Jared Bhatti, Zachary Sarah Corleissen, Jen Lambourne, David Nunez and Heidi Waterhouse, Docs for Developers (Apress, 2021).
Smarter documentation: Documentation Style Guide & Technical Reference and ADR 029: Docstring Style.
Further Study
Frameworks: Diátaxis, Daniele Procida’s framework of tutorials, how-to guides, reference and explanation, which most good technical documentation follows.
Style guides: the Google developer documentation style guide and the Microsoft Writing Style Guide.
Tools: the Sphinx documentation, its reStructuredText primer, the Read the Docs tutorial, and Vale for checking prose against a style guide.
Community: Write the Docs, its guide, its newsletter and its Slack, and the Good Docs Project templates.
YouTube: conference talks on the Write the Docs channel, including Daniele Procida’s talk on Diátaxis.
Reading: the documentation of Django, Stripe and the Python standard library, often held up as models, studied as examples of structure and voice.